Menu
DECLARACIÓN DE LAS GRANDES TRIBUS LIBIAS: SEPTIEMBRE 2017

DECLARACIÓN DE LAS GRANDES TRIBUS LIBIAS: SEPTIEMBRE 2017

Declaración de las Grandes Tribus Libias: Septiembre 2017 ...

Imbakbka, sopa Libia

Imbakbka, sopa Libia

Imbakbka, sopa típica libia   Es una sopa espesa li...

PALABRAS DEL LÍDER LIBIO EN GHAT

PALABRAS DEL LÍDER LIBIO EN GHAT

Palabras del líder libio en el 2004 en Ghat El yemen&ia...

¿Quién es ISIS, Estado Islámico?

¿Quién es ISIS, Estado Islámico?

Estamos oyendo continuamente que los atentados terroristas perp...

CÓMO ACABAR CON EL TERRORISMO

CÓMO ACABAR CON EL TERRORISMO

                C&Oa...

FALSOS GRUPOS DE AYUDA HUMANITARIA AL DESCUBIERTO POR LOS LIBIOS

FALSOS GRUPOS DE AYUDA HUMANITARIA AL DESCUBIERTO POR LOS LIBIOS

Dos grupos más de “Ayuda Humanitaria”, invasor...

LA EMIGRACIÓN AFRICANA COMO ARMA DE INVASIÓN

LA EMIGRACIÓN AFRICANA COMO ARMA DE INVASIÓN

La emigración africana como arma de invasión Lib...

ITALIA INVADE LIBIA UTILIZANDO AL MUÑECO DE NACIONES UNIDAS SERRAJ COMO EXCUSA

ITALIA INVADE LIBIA UTILIZANDO AL MUÑECO DE NACIONES UNIDAS SERRAJ COMO EXCUSA

Italia Invade Libia utilizando al muñeco de Naciones Unida...

ITALIA INVADE LIBIA UTILIZANDO AL MUÑECO DE NACIONES UNIDAS SERRAJ COMO EXCUSA

ITALIA INVADE LIBIA UTILIZANDO AL MUÑECO DE NACIONES UNIDAS SERRAJ COMO EXCUSA

Italia Invade Libia utilizando al muñeco de Naciones Unida...

Prev Next

Items filtered by date: Septiembre 2016 - Leonor en Libia

El parlamento Británico reconoce que la agresion a Libia estuvo basada en mentiras

Sabíamos que mentían, sabíamos que era una invasión criminal sin escrúpulos.
Los libios hicieron grandes esfuerzos de todas las formas posibles para demostrar al mundo que lo que se decía de ellos era falso.
Sabíamos que, al igual que ha ocurrido en Ir
ak, tras lograr sus objetivos los responsables de esta agresión la reconocerían y nada ocurriría, ni siquiera dejarían de controlar lo que han logrado ni intentarían indemnizar a los dañados que han logrado sobrevivir.
A pesar de que lo sabíamos porque ya ha ocurrido en anteriores ocasiones, sigo sintiendo una gran impotencia. No sirve de nada decir

“Lo veis, es lo que os decía”.

Nada sirve de nada porque no se puede recuperar a los muertos, los enfermos, los tullidos, los desplazados, el sufrimiento, el país destruido, los robos, …
Exactamente por esto he comprendido que las leyes son una payasada para controlar al que interesa controlar y saltársela cuando interesa por parte de esta élite económica.
Este parlamento británico que ahora dice que confirma que la invasión estaba basada en mentiras, sabía y disponía de toda la información desde el principio, sabían lo que hacían y lo hicieron con intención por intereses económicos o geopolíticos sin importar los seres humanos. Y lo peor es que siguen haciendo porque mientras reconocen con una mano, con la otra siguen sus planes unidos a EEUU.
Vamos a ver si la intervención española bajo Zapatero va a reconocer que la agresión y el gasto del dinero de los españoles fue una barbaridad. ¿Va la ley a tomar parte en este vandalismo criminal?.
No podemos olvidar como las Organizaciones que creíamos que eran las que velaban por nuestra seguridad son las responsables de esta barbaridad. Recordamos como si fuera ahora mismo como Naciones Unidas impuso a Libia la prohibición de no volar basándose en mentiras reconocidas y sabidas como tales, mientras enviaban a la organización armada más grande del mundo, La OTAN, a destruir completamente el país y someter a los libios al asedio crminal jamás imaginable, mientras introducían a sus mercenarios a los que llamaban terroristas y que sin embargo apoyaban desde tierra a los aviones de la OTAN y viceversa, haciendo el trabajo "sucio". 
Recuerdo perfectamente cada día, cada conversación, el pánico, el sufrimiento de los libios que vivían bajo las bombas de la OTAN sin razón alguna y sin que ni un solo avión libio despegara del suelo mientras los aviones de la OTAN violaban el espacio aereo libio, cada día durante 8 meses, varias veces al día, bombardeando y destruyendo el país entero, infraestructuras, colegios, hospitales, granjas, animales, depositos de alimentos,...
Estuve en Trípoli en el 2011 bajo las bombas de la OTAN y fui testigo directo de las mentiras de la OTAN, de todos los periodistas procedentes de los grandes medios occidentales que no informaban de lo que ocurría y encubrían la verdad hasta hoy.

Nunca imaginé que un ser humano fuera capaz de tales atrocidades, crímenes, destrucción y barbaridades y sin embargo hemos podido ver que quienes han perpetrado estas barbaridades y siguen haciéndolo son los que llamamos los "buenos", son nuestros gobiernos, nuestras organizaciones supuestamente defensoras de los derechos humanos, nuestros grandes medios de comunicación que supuestamente nos informan,...

Incluso recuerdo que el líder libio Moammar al Ghadafi ofreció retirarse a cambio de que no destruyeran Libia, pero la respuesta fue NO. Dijeron que querían al gobierno de la Jamahiriyah muerto y destruido. Puede sorprender que diga "el gobierno de la Jamahiriyah" y no diga lo que siempre se dice "Gadafi", porque la realidad es que usar siempre este nombre es solo una parte de la técnica de manipulación de EEUU. NO solo interesaba matar a Gadafi que era solo una persona y que realmente no gobernaba sino que pretendían destruir toda la red tribal y el gobierno de la Jamahiriyah. Esta es una verdad de la que no se habla y cuando han matado, torturado, encarcelado a los líderes tribales o responsables del gobierno libio los medios de comunicación no nos han informado. 

British Parliament Confirms Libya War Was Based On Lies … Turned Nation Into a “Shit Show” … Spread Terrorism
Parlamento británico confirma que Libia fue agredida basándose en mentiras

Posted on September 22, 2016 by WashingtonsBlog

<img style="cursor: -moz-zoom-in;" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-6-x-cT42b8U/TlFEqwDTchI/AAAAAAAAKng/YIUYeB98Ypc/s1600/anthony+freda+HumanitarianBombs.jpg" alt="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-6-x-cT42b8U/TlFEqwDTchI/AAAAAAAAKng/YIUYeB98Ypc/s1600/anthony+freda+HumanitarianBombs.jpg" width="790" height="876.654478976" />

Anthony Freda: www.AnthonyFreda.com.

Parliamentary Report Confirms What the Alternative Media Has Been Saying for Years

The UK Parliament just confirmed what the alternative media has been saying for years.

Specifically, a new report from the bipartisan House of Commons Foreign Affairs Committee – based on interviews with all of the key British decision-makers, review of documents, and on-the-ground investigations in Africa – found that the Libyan war was based on lies, that it destroyed the country, and that it spread terrorism far and wide.

The War Based On Bogus Intelligence … Like the Iraq War

Initially, the report finds that the threat to civilians from Libyan  government forces was dramatically overstated:

Former French Foreign Minister Alain Juppé, who introduced Resolution 1973 [imposing a no-fly zone over Libya, and laying the groundwork for overthrowing the government], asserted in his speech to the Security Council that “the situation on the ground is more alarming than ever, marked by the violent re-conquest of cities”. He stressed the urgency of the situation, arguing that “We have very little time left—perhaps only a matter of hours.” Subsequent analysis suggested that the immediate threat to civilians was being publicly overstated and that the reconquest of cities had not resulted in mass civilian casualties.

***

The proposition that Muammar Gaddafi would have ordered the massacre of civilians in Benghazi  [which was the basis for the West’s war to overthrow Gaddafi] was not supported by the available evidence. The Gaddafi regime had retaken towns from the rebels without attacking civilians in early February 2011 …. Gaddafi regime forces targeted male combatants in a civil war and did not indiscriminately attack civilians. More widely, Muammar Gaddafi’s 40-year record of appalling human rights abuses did not include large-scale attacks on Libyan civilians.

***

On 17 March 2011, Muammar Gaddafi announced to the rebels in Benghazi, “Throw away your weapons, exactly like your brothers in Ajdabiya and other places did. They laid down their arms and they are safe. We never pursued them at all.” Subsequent investigation revealed that when Gaddafi regime forces retook Ajdabiya in February 2011, they did not attack civilians. Muammar Gaddafi also attempted to appease protesters in Benghazi with an offer of development aid before finally deploying troops.

***

An Amnesty International investigation in June 2011 could not corroborate allegations of mass human rights violations by Gaddafi regime troops. However, it uncovered evidence that rebels in Benghazi made false claims and manufactured evidence. The investigation concluded that

much Western media coverage has from the outset presented a very one-sided view of the logic of events, portraying the protest movement as entirely peaceful and repeatedly suggesting that the regime’s security forces were unaccountably massacring unarmed demonstrators who presented no security challenge.

***

In short, the scale of the threat to civilians was presented with unjustified certainty. US intelligence officials reportedly described the intervention as “an intelligence-light decision”.

Just like the ginned up intelligence used to justify the Iraq war. And the “humanitarian wars” waged over the last couple of decades.

The Libyan Government Was Fighting Terrorists

The report also notes that the Libyan government really was – as Libyan dictator Gaddafi claimed at the time – fighting Islamic terrorists:

Intelligence on the extent to which extremist militant Islamist elements were involved in the anti-Gaddafi rebellion was inadequate.

***

Abdelhakim Belhadj and other members of the al-Qaeda affiliated Libyan Islamic Fighting Group were participating in the rebellion in March 2011.

Secret intelligence reports from 2011, written before and during the illegal US-led attack on Libya and recently obtained by the Washington Times, state:

There is a close link between al Qaeda, Jihadi organizations, and the opposition in Libya…

Indeed, the Libyan rebel commander admitted at the time that his fighters had links to Al Qaeda.  And see this.

We reported in 2012:

The U.S. supported opposition which overthrew Libya’s Gadaffi was largely comprised of Al Qaeda terrorists. According to a 2007 report by West Point’s Combating Terrorism Center’s center, the Libyan city of Benghazi was one of Al Qaeda’s main headquarters – and bases for sending Al Qaeda fighters into Iraq – prior to the overthrow of Gaddafi:

<img src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-liwxsBFq_t8/UIhe2BB69qI/AAAAAAAAElc/WWSQ5URIQ-Y/s640/WestPoint_1_LibyaAQvsAS.jpg" alt="" width="640" height="280" border="0" /> The Hindustan Times reported last year:

“There is no question that al Qaeda’s Libyan franchise, Libyan Islamic Fighting Group, is a part of the opposition,” Bruce Riedel, former CIA officer and a leading expert on terrorism, told Hindustan Times.

It has always been Qaddafi’s biggest enemy and its stronghold is Benghazi.

***

(Incidentally, Gaddafi was on the verge of invading Benghazi in 2011, 4 years after the West Point report cited Benghazi as a hotbed of Al Qaeda terrorists. Gaddafi claimed – rightly it turns out – that Benghazi was an Al Qaeda stronghold and a main source of the Libyan rebellion.  But NATO planes stopped him, and protected Benghazi.)

The Daily Mail reported in 2014:

A self-selected group of former top military officers, CIA insiders and think-tankers, declared Tuesday in Washington that a seven-month review of the deadly 2012 terrorist attack has determined that it could have been prevented – if the U.S. hadn’t been helping to arm al-Qaeda militias throughout Libya a year earlier.

‘The United States switched sides in the war on terror with what we did in Libya, knowingly facilitating the provision of weapons to known al-Qaeda militias and figures,’ Clare Lopez, a member of the commission and a former CIA officer, told MailOnline.

She blamed the Obama administration for failing to stop half of a $1 billion United Arab Emirates arms shipment from reaching al-Qaeda-linked militants.

‘Remember, these weapons that came into Benghazi were permitted to enter by our armed forces who were blockading the approaches from air and sea,’ Lopez claimed. ‘They were permitted to come in. … [They] knew these weapons were coming in, and that was allowed..

‘The intelligence community was part of that, the Department of State was part of that, and certainly that means that the top leadership of the United States, our national security leadership, and potentially Congress – if they were briefed on this – also knew about this.’

***

‘The White House and senior Congressional members,’ the group wrote in an interim report released Tuesday, ‘deliberately and knowingly pursued a policy that provided material support to terrorist organizations in order to topple a ruler [Muammar Gaddafi] who had been working closely with the West actively to suppress al-Qaeda.’

‘Some look at it as treason,’ said Wayne Simmons, a former CIA officer who participated in the commission’s research.

The West and Its Allies Directly Supported and Armed the Rebels

The UK report confirms that the West and its allies directly supported and armed the rebels:

The combat performance of rebel ground forces was enhanced by personnel and intelligence provided by states such as the UK, France, Turkey, Qatar and the United Arab Emirates. For example, Lord Richards told us that the UK “had a few people embedded” with the rebel forces.

Resolution 1973 called on United Nations member states to ensure the “strict implementation of the arms embargo”. However, we were told that the international community turned a blind eye to the supply of weapons to the rebels. Lord Richards highlighted “the degree to which the Emiratis and the Qataris … played a major role in the success of the ground operation.” For example, Qatar supplied French Milan anti­tank missiles to certain rebel groups. We were told that Qatar channelled its weapons to favoured militias rather than to the rebels as a whole.

The REAL Motivation for War

The real motivation for the war?  The Parliamentary report explains:

A further insight into French motivations was provided in a freedom of information disclosure by the United States State Department in December 2015. On 2 April 2011, Sidney Blumenthal, adviser and unofficial intelligence analyst to the then United States Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, reported this conversation with French intelligence officers to the Secretary of State:

According to these individuals Sarkozy’s plans are driven by the following issues:

  1. A desire to gain a greater share of Libya oil production,
  2. Increase French influence in North Africa,
  3. Improve his internal political situation in France,
  4. Provide the French military with an opportunity to reassert its position in the world,
  5. Address the concern of his advisors over Qaddafi’s long term plans to supplant France as the dominant power in Francophone Africa.

The sum of four of the five factors identified by Sidney Blumenthal equated to the French national interest. The fifth factor was President Sarkozy’s political self-interest.

Gaddafi Tried to Step Down … But the West Insisted On Violent Regime Change

Gaddafi had offered to hand over power, but the West instead wanted violent regime change. (The British report notes: “By the summer of 2011, the limited intervention to protect civilians had drifted into an opportunist policy of regime change.”)

The Parliamentary report notes that Gaddaffi may have been attempting to flee the country when he was killed:

Muammar Gaddafi might have been seeking an exit from Libya in February and March 2011. On 21 February 2011, for example, Lord Hague told reporters that he had seen credible information that Muammar Gaddafi was on his way to exile in Venezuela. Concerted action after the telephone calls conducted by Mr Blair might have led to Muammar Gaddafi’s abdication and to a negotiated solution in Libya. It was therefore important to keep the lines of communication open. However, we saw no evidence that the then Prime Minister David Cameron attempted to exploit Mr Blair’s contacts.

***

Political options were available if the UK Government had adhered to the spirit of Resolution 1973, implemented its original campaign plan and influenced its coalition allies to pause military action when Benghazi was secured in March 2011. Political engagement might have delivered civilian protection, regime change and reform at lesser cost to the UK and to Libya. If political engagement had been unsuccessful, the UK and its coalition allies would not have lost anything. Instead, the UK Government focused exclusively on military intervention. In particular, we saw no evidence that it tried to exploit former Prime Minister Tony Blair’s contacts and influence with the Gaddafi regime.

The U.S. and France were also hell-bent on regime change.  And the New York Times confirms that Hillary Clinton is largely responsible for the violent regime change in Libya.

Why Should We Care?

Why should we care?

Well, the House of Commons report confirms that the Libyan war has wrecked the country:

The Libyan economy generated some $75 billion of gross domestic product (GDP) in 2010. This economy produced an average annual per capita income of approximately $12,250, which was comparable to the average income in some European countries. [The former Indian representative to the U.N. notes that, before the war, Libya had less of its population in poverty than the Netherlands.  Libyans had access to free health care, education, electricity and interest-free loans, and women had great freedoms that were applauded by the U.N. Human Rights Council]. Libyan Government revenue greatly exceeded expenditure in the 2000s. … The United Nations Human Development Report 2010—a United Nations aggregate measure of health, education and income—ranked Libya as the 53rd most advanced country in the world for human development and as the most advanced country in Africa.

***

In 2014, the most recent year for which reliable figures are available … the average Libyan’s annual income had decreased from $12,250 in 2010 to $7,820. Since 2014, Libya’s economic predicament has reportedly deteriorated. Libya is likely to experience a budget deficit of some 60% of GDP in 2016. The requirement to finance that deficit is rapidly depleting net foreign reserves, which halved from $107 billion in 2013 to $56.8 billion by the end of 2015. Production of crude oil fell to its lowest recorded level in 2015, while oil prices collapsed in the second half of 2014. Inflation increased to 9.2% driven by a 13.7% increase in food prices including a fivefold increase in the price of flour. The United Nations ranked Libya as the world’s 94th most advanced country in its 2015 index of human development, a decline from 53rd place in 2010.

***

In 2016, the UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs estimated that out of a total Libyan population of 6.3 million, 3 million people have been impacted by the armed conflict and political instability, and that 2.4 million people require protection and some form of humanitarian assistance. In its World Report 2016, Human Rights Watch stated that Libya is

heading towards a humanitarian crisis, with almost 400,000 people internally displaced and increasing disruption to basic services, such as power and fuel supplies. Forces engaged in the conflict continued with impunity to arbitrarily detain, torture, unlawfully kill, indiscriminately attack, abduct and disappear, and forcefully displace people from their homes. The domestic criminal justice system collapsed in most parts of the country, exacerbating the human rights crisis

People-trafficking gangs exploited the lack of effective government after 2011, making Libya a key transit route for illegal migration into Europe and the location of a migrant crisis. In addition to other extremist militant groups, ISIL emerged in Libya in 2014, seizing control of territory around Sirte and setting up terrorist training centres. Human Rights Watch documented unlawful executions by ISIL in Sirte of at least 49 people by methods including decapitation and shooting. The civil war between west and east has waxed and waned with sporadic outbreaks of violence since 2014. In April 2016, United States President Barack Obama described post-intervention Libya as a “shit show”. It is difficult to disagree with this pithy assessment.

The Parliamentary report confirms that the Libyan war – like the Iraq war – has ended up spreading terrorism around the globe:

Libyan weapons and ammunition were trafficked across North and West Africa and the Middle East.

***

The United Nations Panel of Experts appointed to examine the impact of Resolution 1973 identified the presence of ex-Libyan weapons in Algeria, Chad, Egypt, Gaza, Mali, Niger, Tunisia and Syria. The panel concluded that “arms originating from Libya have significantly reinforced the military capacity of terrorist groups operating in Algeria, Egypt, Mali and Tunisia.” In the 2010-15 Parliament, our predecessor Committee noted that the failure to secure the Gaddafi regime’s arms caches had led to “a proliferation of small arms and light weapons, and some heavier artillery, across North and West Africa”. It identified that Libyan small arms had apparently ended up in the hands of Boko Haram militants.

***

In January 2014, Egyptian Islamist insurgents used an ex-Libyan MANPAD to shoot down an Egyptian Army helicopter in the Sinai.

***

The FCO told us that “Political instability in Libya has led to a permissive environment for terrorist groups in which to operate, including ISIL [i.e. ISIS] affiliated groups”.  Professor Patrick Porter, Professor of Strategic Studies at the University of Exeter, agreed with the FCO analysis, stating that “a lack of effective government is creating opportunities for the Islamic State.”

***

ISIL has used its presence in Libya to train terrorists. For example, Sefeddine Rezgui, the gunman who killed Western holidaymakers in Tunisia in June 2015, was trained by ISIL at its base in Sabratha along with the two gunmen who killed 22 tourists at the Bardo museum in Tunis. ISIL’s plans may extend beyond terrorism. Vice-Admiral Clive Johnstone, a Royal Navy officer and NATO commander, commented that

We know they [ISIL] have ambitions to go offshore … There is a horrible opportunity in the future that a misdirected, untargeted round of a very high quality weapons system will just happen to target a cruise liner, or an oil platform, or a container ship.

And the UK report confirms that the Libyan war has created a tidal wave of refugees:

The International Organization for Migration (IOM) estimated that some 1 million migrants were present in Libya in June 2016. This estimate comprised 425,000 internally displaced Libyans, 250,000 non-Libyan migrants and 250,000 returnees. Most non-Libyan migrants travelled from West Africa, the Horn of Africa, South Asia and the Middle East. The most common countries of origin for non-Libyan migrants were Niger, Egypt, Chad, Ghana and Sudan. Between 1 January and 31 May 2016, 47,851 migrants arrived in Italy after crossing the Mediterranean from Libya. A similar number of migrants attempted the crossing over the same period in 2015. Despite the increased resources committed to Operation Triton, however, crossing the Mediterranean is becoming increasingly hazardous for migrants transiting through Libya. The IOM recorded 2,061 migrants as dead or missing between 1 January and 31 May 2016, which showed a 15% increase in fatalities compared with the same period in 2015.

In other words – just like the Iraq war – the Libyan war was based on fake intelligence, was carried out for reasons having little to do with national security or protecting civilians, destroyed a nation and created a “shit show”, spread terrorism far and wide, and created waves of refugees.

Read more...
Subscribe to this RSS feed

SECCIONES

INFORMACIÓN DE INTERÉS

  • Capital: Trípoli
  • Código del país   +218
  • Lengua oficial   árabe
  • Moneda: Dinar libio (LYD) 
  • 1LYD = 0,67 € (NOV 2015)
  • Hora: Greenwich+2
  • Área: 1.775.500 Km2

NOSOTROS

SOCIAL

Subscripción Boletín